Trump Accuses Schiff Of Lying About Maryland Home To Commit Mortgage Fraud

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump on Tuesday renewed accusations that Sen. Adam Schiff engaged in mortgage fraud related to a property in Maryland, claims the California Democrat has strongly rejected as politically motivated.
In a post on the social media platform Truth Social, Trump accused Schiff of improperly identifying a Maryland home as his primary residence for more than a decade in order to secure favorable mortgage terms. The president alleged that the issue was discovered by the financial crimes division of Fannie Mae, though he did not provide supporting evidence.
“I have always suspected Adam Schiff was a scam artist,” Trump wrote, alleging that Schiff listed his Maryland property as his principal residence beginning in 2009 and later changed the designation to a second home in 2020.
Trump added that mortgage fraud is a serious offense and suggested Schiff should face legal consequences if wrongdoing were proven.
Trump Later Moderates Claim
Later Tuesday, when questioned by reporters about the allegations, Trump appeared to soften his statement, saying he was uncertain about the specifics of the charge.
“I don’t know about the individual charge, if that even happened,” Trump said, though he reiterated criticism of Schiff personally and said he would like to see the matter investigated.
Schiff Rejects Allegations
Schiff dismissed the claims as unfounded and part of a long-running political dispute between the two men.
The senator wrote on social media that the accusations were “baseless” and described them as another example of political retaliation connected to his role in Trump’s first impeachment during the First impeachment of Donald Trump.
“Since I led his first impeachment, Trump has repeatedly called for me to be arrested for treason,” Schiff wrote, adding that the latest allegations would not deter him from continuing his criticism of the president.
A spokesperson for Schiff also rejected the accusations, stating that lenders involved in the mortgages were fully aware of Schiff’s congressional duties and his use of residences in both Maryland and California.
Questions Over Property Designations
Public records show that Schiff purchased the Maryland property in 2009 while serving as a member of the U.S. House of Representatives representing California. Lawmakers in Congress are required by the Constitution to be inhabitants of the state they represent at the time of election, though the rule does not necessarily dictate their primary residence throughout their tenure.
Reports examining mortgage and financial records have noted that Schiff listed both a Maryland property and a residence in Burbank, California as principal residences on different documents over the years. The Maryland property was later designated as a secondary residence in updated filings.
The issue was previously raised in an ethics complaint filed with Congress by a Republican activist who reviewed the records.
No Comment From Fannie Mae
A representative for Fannie Mae declined to comment on the matter when contacted. It remains unclear whether any formal investigation has been launched regarding the claims.
Schiff later released a video response reiterating that the allegations lack merit and accusing the president of attempting to distract from other political controversies.
Continuing Political Feud
The dispute underscores the long-running political rivalry between Trump and Schiff. As a House member, Schiff was a central figure in investigations into the Trump administration and served as the lead manager during Trump’s first impeachment trial in the Senate.
The latest exchange highlights how those tensions continue to shape political rhetoric as both figures remain prominent voices in Washington’s ongoing partisan conflicts.
CHAOS On the Set! House Minority Leader Explodes At CNBC Host After He's Cornered Over Obamacare Subsidies
NEW YORK, NY — The polished veneer of the Democrat healthcare narrative shattered on national television this week as House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries suffered a visible and vocal meltdown on CNBC’s "Squawk Box." In a segment that has quickly gone viral across the 2026 digital landscape, host Becky Quick executed a clinical cross-examination of the Democrat strategy to ransom the U.S. government over the sunsetting of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) subsidies.

The confrontation marked a pivotal moment in the post-government shutdown political theater, exposing what Speaker Mike Johnson has termed the "Politics of Fear." As Jeffries pivoted, deflected, and eventually erupted in anger, the cold hard reality of the 2026 healthcare crisis was laid bare: a system defined by 60% premium increases, a trillion-dollar price tag, and a Democrat leadership more interested in political leverage than bipartisan solutions.
I. THE CNBC CORNER: "LET’S NOT GO BACK TO THE PAST"
The tension began when Becky Quick pressed Jeffries on the necessity of a bipartisan approach to the looming expiration of taxpayer-provided ACA subsidies. These subsidies, which have artificially suppressed the soaring costs of Obamacare premiums, were strategically set to sunset on December 1, 2025, by the Biden-led Congress—a move critics say was designed to create a "cliff" that would force a Republican-led House into a spending trap.
1. The "Hang Themselves" Accusation
The debate reached a boiling point when Quick directly challenged Jeffries’ motivations for refusing to negotiate on a sustainable, bipartisan reform.
“I don’t think you want to get a deal done,” Quick said, looking directly at a stunned Jeffries. “I think this is something where you’d like to see the rates go higher and allow Republicans to hang themselves with it.”
The assertion struck a nerve. Jeffries, visibly frustrated, abandoned his usual measured tone. “That is a ridiculous assertion! Shame on you!” he shot back, his voice rising as the set descended into chaos. For the American public, the explosion was a tell—a sign that the host had accurately identified the Democrat "Lawfare" strategy being applied to the healthcare sector.
II. THE 60 PERCENT REALITY: OBAMACARE’S FAILED PROMISE
While Jeffries focused on rhetoric, Speaker Mike Johnson utilized his weekly press conference to provide the devastating statistics that have defined the ACA in 2026. The "Affordable" Care Act has become anything but, with the GOP majority revealing that by some estimates, premiums have risen an average of 60% since the program's inception.
1. Subsidies for Insurance Giants
Johnson argued that the "trillion dollars in new spending" demanded by Democrats to reopen the government was not going to patients, but was instead a direct transfer of wealth to insurance companies.
“The Democrats don’t reform Obamacare. They want to subsidize it,” Johnson explained. “That goes mostly to insurance companies, which makes the cost rise further. That’s the Democrats’ plan.”
By continuing to pump taxpayer billions into a broken system, the GOP argues that the radical left is merely inflating the bubble while masking the true, unsustainable cost of the healthcare mandates passed without a single Republican vote in 2010.
III. SAVING MEDICAID: THE AUDIT OF INELIGIBILITY
One of the most significant achievements of the 2026 Republican House has been the aggressive "cleanup" of the Medicaid system—a move Johnson cited as proof that the GOP is the party "fighting to save healthcare."
1. Removing Millions of Ineligible Enrollees
The Speaker revealed that the GOP has successfully moved millions of ineligible enrollees off the Medicaid rolls. This audit was not a cut to services, but a restoration of the program’s original intent.
“We got millions of ineligible enrollees off the program and it preserved it,” Johnson said. “It strengthened Medicaid for the people who rely upon it, which is the elderly, disabled, and young pregnant women.”
By eliminating the fraud, waste, and abuse that had bloated the system under the previous administration, the GOP has ensured that the safety net remains solvent for the most vulnerable Americans. The Democrat opposition to these common-sense audits, Johnson argued, is further evidence that they prioritize "raw numbers" over "quality care."
IV. THE POLITICS OF FEAR VS. THE MANDATE FOR REFORM
The recent government shutdown, which many in the media attempted to frame as a Republican failure, was re-categorized by Johnson as a "false claim" induced by Democrat intransigence. He asserted that the conflict was never truly about healthcare, but about the Radical Left’s fear of losing control over the taxpayer purse.
1. Ransom and Leverage
The December 1 sunset was a "timed bomb" left by the Biden administration. By refusing to work on a bipartisan fix throughout 2025, Jeffries and the House Democrats hoped to use the resulting premium spikes as a political weapon in the 2026 Midterms.
“No, [the shutdown] is not about healthcare,” Johnson declared. “This is about FEAR. Everyone in America understands that this is about something else.” That "something else" is the continued attempt to expand the "Deep State" bureaucracy into every facet of the American economy, using the health of the citizens as collateral.
V. THE 2026 RENAISSANCE: A NEW HEALTHCARE DOCTRINE
As the 2026 Renaissance continues to sweep through Washington, the Trump-aligned GOP is proposing a total shift away from the "subsidy-and-spend" model of the last 15 years. The new doctrine focuses on:
-
Reducing Costs through Competition: Moving away from state-mandated monopolies.
-
Increasing Access and Quality: Allowing for more diverse and affordable plan options.
-
Eliminating Fraud: Continuing the aggressive audits started by Speaker Johnson.
The confrontation on CNBC served as a microcosm of the national debate. On one side, Hakeem Jeffries represents the "Old Guard" of the DNC—relying on explosions of anger and accusations of "shame" to deflect from the fiscal failure of their policies. On the other side, the GOP majority is presenting a "Victorious American" vision: a healthcare system that is sustainable, accountable, and actually affordable.
CONCLUSION: THE END OF THE HEALTHCARE GRIFT
Hakeem Jeffries’ explosion at Becky Quick was not just a moment of bad television; it was the sound of a narrative collapsing. For over a decade, Democrats have used the "Affordable Care Act" as a moral shield to justify trillions in spending. In 2026, with premiums up 60% and the GOP exposing the "insurance company payday," that shield has shattered.
Speaker Mike Johnson and the House GOP have called the Democrats' bluff. By reopening the government without surrendering to the trillion-dollar subsidy demand, they have forced the discussion back to actual reform and fiscal reality.
The era of "subsidizing the failure" is over. As we head toward the 2026 Midterms, the American people are seeing the difference between those who want to "hang" their opponents with higher rates and those who are doing the hard work of saving the safety net for the elderly and disabled. The chaos on the CNBC set was the beginning of the end for the Obamacare grift.